Another HIWATT Fane

HIWATT Cabinets and Speakers from the Hylight Electronics era

Moderator: Mods

Post Reply
User avatar
mikhailwatt
Posts: 858
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Austin TX

Another HIWATT Fane

Post by mikhailwatt »

Snagged another...
Image

In transit, should be here in a couple of days from Vancouver...
(Shipping was cheaper than the gas to go pick it up, and I avoided another "border inquisition!" :shock: :lol: )

Reportedly from '76 and looks to be a stamped frame.
Hopefully it'll be a fine companion to the old '71 cast frame! :D
You can almost feel the current flowing
You can almost see the circuits blowing
User avatar
OldSchoolDave
Posts: 2060
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:24 pm
Location: HP, NC USA
Contact:

Re: Another HIWATT Fane

Post by OldSchoolDave »

Looks similar to the ones in Clayton's "Gin Blossoms" cab - which sound fantastic.

nice score!

Dave
...Hey! I played that song when it was new...

http://www.OldSchoolDave.com
User avatar
mikhailwatt
Posts: 858
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Austin TX

Re: Another HIWATT Fane

Post by mikhailwatt »

It arrived today in one piece (the guy screwed it to a piece of plywood for protection) and it looks good! No time to try it out tonight, or take pics.

It's a model 122231, date stamped 46/76, 15 ohm, stamped frame. I'm assuming it's a 14,000 flux density model, same as my old 122231?

The cone looks original (not sure about the dust cap - pics might tell more) and it's an 010 003. I forget, is that a Pulsonic number?

If it weren't for the solder on the terminals you could almost call it NOS by the looks.
You can almost feel the current flowing
You can almost see the circuits blowing
User avatar
OldSchoolDave
Posts: 2060
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:24 pm
Location: HP, NC USA
Contact:

Re: Another HIWATT Fane

Post by OldSchoolDave »

mikhailwatt wrote:I'm assuming it's a 14,000 flux density model, same as my old 122231?
There's a noticeable difference in weight between the 14,000 and 17,000 gauss magnets. If you're not feeling it, they're both 14,000.
mikhailwatt wrote:The cone looks original (not sure about the dust cap - pics might tell more) and it's an 010 003. I forget, is that a Pulsonic number?
I've wondered that myself, but have never found confirmation that Fane used Pulsonic. In any case, I've got those on some of my Fanes and they're keepers. Think ya done good!

Dave
...Hey! I played that song when it was new...

http://www.OldSchoolDave.com
User avatar
Dr.HI-TONE
Site Admin
Posts: 2675
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:51 pm
Location: HIWATT Valley

Re: Another HIWATT Fane

Post by Dr.HI-TONE »

All of the 122231's were 14,000 gauss, fane stopped using the stickers on the stamped frames.

Nice Find!
http://www.HI-TONE-Amps.com

HI-TONE, when only the best will do.

DR-F
User avatar
mikhailwatt
Posts: 858
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Austin TX

Re: Another HIWATT Fane

Post by mikhailwatt »

Yeah, it seems to be about the same weight as the old-timer 122231. Should be a good match. I'll put the Fanes on top, Thames on the bottom.

The Gin Blossoms cab has the 17,000 gauss Fanes, right?
You can almost feel the current flowing
You can almost see the circuits blowing
User avatar
Dr.HI-TONE
Site Admin
Posts: 2675
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:51 pm
Location: HIWATT Valley

Re: Another HIWATT Fane

Post by Dr.HI-TONE »

no, it has the 122231's

It sounds good too!
http://www.HI-TONE-Amps.com

HI-TONE, when only the best will do.

DR-F
User avatar
mikhailwatt
Posts: 858
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Austin TX

Re: Another HIWATT Fane

Post by mikhailwatt »

OldSchoolDave wrote:I've wondered that myself, but have never found confirmation that Fane used Pulsonic.
According to the data I've seen from Scumback, the "holy grail" Greenbacks used either the 102 003 (75hz lead) Pulsonic cones, or the 102 014 (55hz bass).

So my guess is that 010 003 is a Pulsonic cone. Interesting, the '71 122231 has a 1021/15 cone code. Hmmm...
You can almost feel the current flowing
You can almost see the circuits blowing
User avatar
mikhailwatt
Posts: 858
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Austin TX

Re: Another HIWATT Fane

Post by mikhailwatt »

Dr.HIWATT wrote:no, it has the 122231's
Cool. 8)

Something tells me I'm going to be testing it with my ghosty iWATT before I start changing out those filter caps!
You can almost feel the current flowing
You can almost see the circuits blowing
User avatar
mikhailwatt
Posts: 858
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Austin TX

Re: Another HIWATT Fane

Post by mikhailwatt »

Image
Image
Image

Just pics, no test yet. :(

The cone seems to have a higher "pitch" when tapping on it, compared to the '71. More like my Thames.
You can almost feel the current flowing
You can almost see the circuits blowing
User avatar
mikhailwatt
Posts: 858
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Austin TX

Re: Another HIWATT Fane

Post by mikhailwatt »

-- 2 HIWATT Fanes (122231) on top
-- 2 Weber Thames (50 watt) on bottom
-- '103 Clone - channels dimed, master @ 5
-- Hearos in :shock:
-- Grille cloth flapping in the breeze

Glorious! :D
You can almost feel the current flowing
You can almost see the circuits blowing
User avatar
OldSchoolDave
Posts: 2060
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:24 pm
Location: HP, NC USA
Contact:

Re: Another HIWATT Fane

Post by OldSchoolDave »

mikhailwatt wrote: Glorious! :D
Amen, brother! Looking forward to hearing that combination at the Convention.

Dave
...Hey! I played that song when it was new...

http://www.OldSchoolDave.com
Post Reply