Hello,
Looking for advice please regards this early DR103. I previously gave details of the circuit variation and would like to return it to usable condition certainly,.. but what else ?
Condition is very poor, simply had a very hard life I guess - maybe a good example of how much abuse one of these can take and still function. But time for some action and I am faced with some difficult choices over what to do; certainly re valve (add a bias adjust), electrolytics replacement, good check over and remove the mods,.. but how far to go (especially with the cabinet) ? Apologies in advance, this is not a pretty sight and I hastily add that I am not responsible for any of it
How does she sound - fragile, with a lot of hum,.. very much in need of some TLC.
Thanks for all advice.
Andrew
DR103 S/N 894
Moderator: Mods
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:42 pm
DR103 S/N 894
- Attachments
-
- SAM_0591c.jpg (176.16 KiB) Viewed 3339 times
-
- SAM_0592c.jpg (168.02 KiB) Viewed 3339 times
-
- SAM_0593c.jpg (190.44 KiB) Viewed 3339 times
-
- SAM_0596c.jpg (200.95 KiB) Viewed 3339 times
-
- SAM_0604c.jpg (212.86 KiB) Viewed 3339 times
-
- SAM_0607c.jpg (195.38 KiB) Viewed 3339 times
-
- SAM_0609c.jpg (176.69 KiB) Viewed 3339 times
-
- SAM_0611c.jpg (184.95 KiB) Viewed 3339 times
-
- SAM_0613c.jpg (173.54 KiB) Viewed 3339 times
- OldSchoolDave
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:24 pm
- Location: HP, NC USA
- Contact:
Re: DR103 S/N 894
Shame someone used the serial plate for target practice .
Getting the filter capacitors straightened out (complete recap kit) and a fresh set of valves should restore the punch.
It's a worthy project - best of luck.
Dave
Getting the filter capacitors straightened out (complete recap kit) and a fresh set of valves should restore the punch.
It's a worthy project - best of luck.
Dave
- Dr.HI-TONE
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2675
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:51 pm
- Location: HIWATT Valley
Re: DR103 S/N 894
I would set it right, and accept it for what it is.
I am not one for throwing a bunch of money away on cosmetics.
I used to own #903 that had the same "marshall-like" preamp and it would really scream.
It will be a great amp when un-mucked.
I am not one for throwing a bunch of money away on cosmetics.
I used to own #903 that had the same "marshall-like" preamp and it would really scream.
It will be a great amp when un-mucked.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:42 pm
Re: DR103 S/N 894
thanks
target practice - yes, I have this vision of someone drilling holes for the jacks from the inside, using a hand drill,.... hope they switched her off first
cosmetically - well she is very 'rock and roll' I'll try to clean things up a bit and have a close look at the cabinet,.. a lot of weight through the carry handle to be relying on silicon and those screws. Time perhaps for a flight case project.
all the best,
andrew
target practice - yes, I have this vision of someone drilling holes for the jacks from the inside, using a hand drill,.... hope they switched her off first
cosmetically - well she is very 'rock and roll' I'll try to clean things up a bit and have a close look at the cabinet,.. a lot of weight through the carry handle to be relying on silicon and those screws. Time perhaps for a flight case project.
all the best,
andrew
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:42 pm
Re: DR103 S/N 894
Hello again, too many distractions, including a lovely 74 DR103 and cab. which I have been enjoying playing with (bit of a novelty that). But I finally got around to cleaning up #894. FX loop and line out mods removed, filter and bias caps replaced, bit more cleaning up now that those axial filter caps have gone, then look at a bias adjustment mod and some new EL34s. Sadly most of the Mullard pre amp tubes are microphonic or noisy, so will need something there too. Fair bit of carbon on the back of one EL34 socket and they are not the tightest, ..new sockets ?
Advice please, Hiwatts are of course famous for wiring neatness, quality etc. How about these early amps ? apart from the terrible mods, the basic wiring of #894 seems to be quite rough,.. is that normal ? I found when changing the filter caps that the wiring is quite fragile; single core wire breaking and insulation brittle - my aim is functional / reliable and I'll check the continuity of all the old wiring before powering her up,.. just concerned about chasing broken wires every other week in the future. Appreciate the thoughts of anyone who's done a restoration previously. I suppose in a nutshell I am cautious about how far to go when dealing with something that places such a high value on originality. I do not expect to gig with this amp but would like to use it for recording / studio work.
thanks,
andrew
Advice please, Hiwatts are of course famous for wiring neatness, quality etc. How about these early amps ? apart from the terrible mods, the basic wiring of #894 seems to be quite rough,.. is that normal ? I found when changing the filter caps that the wiring is quite fragile; single core wire breaking and insulation brittle - my aim is functional / reliable and I'll check the continuity of all the old wiring before powering her up,.. just concerned about chasing broken wires every other week in the future. Appreciate the thoughts of anyone who's done a restoration previously. I suppose in a nutshell I am cautious about how far to go when dealing with something that places such a high value on originality. I do not expect to gig with this amp but would like to use it for recording / studio work.
thanks,
andrew
- Dr.HI-TONE
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2675
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:51 pm
- Location: HIWATT Valley
Re: DR103 S/N 894
because of the condition of this amp, you need not worry about originality.
its too far gone.
Just focus on making it functional and reliable.
all of the talk about the early HIWATTs being built sloppily is unfounded. They were meticulous.
good luck!
its too far gone.
Just focus on making it functional and reliable.
all of the talk about the early HIWATTs being built sloppily is unfounded. They were meticulous.
good luck!
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:42 pm
Re: DR103 S/N 894
Thanks, I opened up the 74 amp (will add details of that in a new post) but for the sake of comparison here's a side by side; 70 on left, 74 on right
74 is un modded and clean, apart from some vandal writing HJ.. 020 on it
anyone know why the 70 amp has the extra chassis holes behind the input jacks ?
thanks,
andrew
74 is un modded and clean, apart from some vandal writing HJ.. 020 on it
anyone know why the 70 amp has the extra chassis holes behind the input jacks ?
thanks,
andrew
- Dr.HI-TONE
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2675
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:51 pm
- Location: HIWATT Valley
Re: DR103 S/N 894
because some of the early PA amps used those for pre-amp tubes.
the same chassis was used for PA's, DR103 and DR504.
the same chassis was used for PA's, DR103 and DR504.