Dave Reeve's design mistake!

HIWATT amps from the Hylight Electronics era

Moderator: Mods

User avatar
mikhailwatt
Posts: 858
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Austin TX

Re: Dave Reeve's design mistake!

Post by mikhailwatt »

loylo wrote:Did you convert the whole preamp to the mid 70's one, or just the resistive mixer on V2? I wonder if I'll change the resistor and caps on the cathode of V1 from 1K5+150µ to 2K2+47n...

I'd also like to know when you plug the OCD whether you put a bit of drive with the pedal or just boost the amp olumewise (clean boost)?
The only changes were:

1) undoing the gain mod (V2B was already unused due to this mod)
2) adding the 470k resistive mixer.

No components were removed or replaced. V1 is shared cathode with 1k5 + 150µF. V2A has a 1k cathode resistor, no bypass cap - same as the early '70s circuit.

I usually set the OCD as a clean boost (clock face references): volume 3:00, drive 7:00-8:00 (barely up), tone 12:00, LP setting. If I'm playing someplace where I can't crank the master volume I'll occasionally kick in slightly more boost/overdrive for leads from a Robin Trower Overdrive or Jekyll & Hyde pedal.

But if I'm able to wind the master way up it doesn't need any boost pedals, except perhaps for higher gain solo stuff. I can't imagine ever needing more gain than that. 8)
You can almost feel the current flowing
You can almost see the circuits blowing
RM112
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 1:47 am

Re: Dave Reeve's design mistake!

Post by RM112 »

I just had the mod done to my bulldog. The difference is substantial. There is some blocking still there but not near as bad. i find it's almost unoticeable now if I'm running some kind of OD infront of it. Super happy!!
User avatar
Tripower455
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:38 pm

Re: Dave Reeve's design mistake!

Post by Tripower455 »

Try as I might, I can't hear this issue with my stock '78.... I can dime the jumpered input channels and while it does get quite overdriven, I don't get that splatty, cutting out sound.

I haven't checked the component values, but the amp is a bit dark overall compared to my 4 hole clone, so maybe some of them had different values from the factory?
lffish133
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:19 am

Re: Dave Reeve's design mistake!

Post by lffish133 »

I thought I'd chip in my two cents here. I have a 78 505, Canadian modded which I have never been a super big fan of, mainly because I don't think the bright channel sounds as good as it should. So I took the mod out and switched V2 back to the stock late 70's preamp using both sides of V2, I also added in Mark's fix for the blocking distortion. It sounded really good, but I still wasn't super happy with how the bright channel sounded. So I used mikhailwatt's idea and converted V2 to the resistive mixer from the mid 70's pre-amp. Oh what a difference that made! Both channels now sounds amazing. It did clean the amp up quite a bit tho, if you are into alot of gain. I really have to crank the preamp to get it to drive, but it is worth it, the tone is so sweet. Props to mikhailwatt for the idea.
-lffish133
RETSUB007
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 9:11 pm

Re: Dave Reeve's design mistake!

Post by RETSUB007 »

ARE YOU GUYS REALLY PLAYING YOUR HIWATTS ON 10!! are you guys married?? where ?when?,how? i got questions!!!!
User avatar
mhuss
Site Admin
Posts: 1440
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:40 am

Re: Dave Reeve's design mistake!

Post by mhuss »

:lol: :lol: :lol: Yes, I am married, and my wife doesn't like loud guitar noise. An attenuator (search here for discussions/opinions) is a useful compromise. 8)

--mark
RETSUB007
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 9:11 pm

Re: Dave Reeve's design mistake!

Post by RETSUB007 »

funny my wife did when we were dating , now not so much :x
User avatar
OldSchoolDave
Posts: 2060
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:24 pm
Location: HP, NC USA
Contact:

Re: Dave Reeve's design mistake!

Post by OldSchoolDave »

RETSUB007 wrote:funny my wife did when we were dating , now not so much :x
Keeping with the PG-13 Rating of this board, I'll refrain from stating other examples where that might be a universal truth :oops: ...

Dave
...Hey! I played that song when it was new...

http://www.OldSchoolDave.com
Bryce
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: Dave Reeve's design mistake!

Post by Bryce »

Heyyy, I see what you did there, Dave!
User avatar
Zells
Posts: 160
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 1:52 am
Location: Louisville

Re: Dave Reeve's design mistake!

Post by Zells »

I first read about Mark's de-fizz mod over a year ago and just now finally took the time to do it. I used two 1M ohm resistors. This amp is now much more articulate when pre-amp volumes are dimed. I expect to plug straight into this amp more often from now on rather than using pedals for drive. 8)

De-fizzed '78 DR103 2-holer

Before:
Image

After:
Image

Image
User avatar
mhuss
Site Admin
Posts: 1440
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:40 am

Re: Dave Reeve's design mistake!

Post by mhuss »

For what it's worth, all other things being equal, I like MW's fix (change to the early 70's resistive mixer) better. However, this mod is much easier to do. :)

I still haven't figured out why, say, 20% of the two-holers don't fizz. Any of you folks with stock ones that sound good, I'd love to see some gut shots of your amp. 8)

--mark
User avatar
Dr.HI-TONE
Site Admin
Posts: 2675
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:51 pm
Location: HIWATT Valley

Re: Dave Reeve's design mistake!

Post by Dr.HI-TONE »

I don't recal any 50 watt amps with the issue???? Is it just limited to DR103s?

My '78 DR504 doesn't do it. I will have to dig up some pics.
http://www.HI-TONE-Amps.com

HI-TONE, when only the best will do.

DR-F
User avatar
mikhailwatt
Posts: 858
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Austin TX

Re: Dave Reeve's design mistake!

Post by mikhailwatt »

mhuss wrote:However, this mod is much easier to do. :)
Really? It's almost the same operation. :)
Dr.HIWATT wrote:I don't recal any 50 watt amps with the issue???? Is it just limited to DR103s?

My '78 DR504 doesn't do it. I will have to dig up some pics.
My '80 DR504 did it big time. But that was also with the gain mod still in place.

My '77 DR505 needs a de-mod. I'll check to see if it "fizzes."
You can almost feel the current flowing
You can almost see the circuits blowing
User avatar
mhuss
Site Admin
Posts: 1440
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:40 am

Re: Dave Reeve's design mistake!

Post by mhuss »

mikhailwatt wrote:
mhuss wrote:However, this mod is much easier to do. :)
Really? It's almost the same operation.
I need to revisit your story, then. You don't change out the 100k->220k and 1k5->2k2 for V2?

--mark
User avatar
mikhailwatt
Posts: 858
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:46 am
Location: Austin TX

Re: Dave Reeve's design mistake!

Post by mikhailwatt »

mhuss wrote:I need to revisit your story, then. You don't change out the 100k->220k and 1k5->2k2 for V2?
Nope... V2a already has the same 100k plate/1k + 47n cathode as the "regular" early '70s circuit. I suppose you could swap them out if you wanted the S/N 2130 "Clean Machine" variant.

Speaking of #2130, I wonder how many "Clean Machines" were produced. All the 4-holer gut shots I've seen have 100k/1k + 47n @ V2.
You can almost feel the current flowing
You can almost see the circuits blowing
Post Reply